$DASH
S-1 Teardown of Doordash
First thing - interesting to not see Morgan Stanley anywhere in the lineup (led Uber IPO)
Love this story: "We started DoorDash to help people like my Mom. I was five years old when I immigrated from China with my parents. Like many immigrants, my family came to this country to pursue the American Dream. Dad came to pursue a Ph.D. in Aeronautical Engineering from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Mom hoped she could retain her job as a doctor, her occupation in China, but the odds were against her. The United States didn’t recognize her Chinese medical license and with only $250 to our family’s name, putting her through school again was impossible. But that didn’t stop her. Mom put food on the table by working three jobs a day for 12 years. One of those jobs was as a server at a local Chinese restaurant, where I got a front row seat as a dishwasher. For Mom, working at a restaurant was a means to an end. After deferring her dreams for more than a decade, she saved enough money to return to school and open her medical clinic, which she still runs more than 20 years later. DoorDash exists today to empower those like my Mom who came here with a dream to make it on their own. Fighting for the underdog is part of who I am and what we stand for as a company. Having spoken to countless merchants since DoorDash’s founding in 2013—from a Mom and Pop store like Oren’s Hummus to the General Managers of Chili’s (aka “ChiliHeads”)—I am humbled by their relentless drive to create and build, and their contribution to their communities. While small businesses are vital to our communities and created approximately two-thirds of net new jobs in the United States from 2000 to 2018,1 they now risk being left behind in the convenience economy where consumers have become accustomed to obtaining everything in a few clicks, a trend that has only accelerated in a COVID world. Helping brick-and-mortar businesses compete, succeed, and flourish in these rapidly changing times is the core problem we are trying to solve."
Another startup borne out of Stanford - good or bad, they crush it
Interesting that this is the number one principle highlighted: "Be customer-obsessed, not competitor-focused" - I guess is this a response to all the critiques around Lyft and Uber fighting with eachother in bad ways? Seems odd but hey what do I know
Market and Partnerships
My first thought is wow - if this is true its amazing that Doordash is 50% of the market and also amazing how fast it changed
Its a bit surprising to see a company flaunt market share given all of the anti-trust concerns in tech these days - somewhat limits acquisitions in the near term probably (Especially in core delivery)
Also it would be interesting to see the total amount of gross proceeds raised by Doordash, Uber Eats, and Grubhub - is this just telling us that a mountain of cash can buy market share?
" We have partnerships with over 175 of the 200 largest national restaurant brands and provide consumers access to a wide selection of merchants. Broad selection, coupled with personalization and curation that is driven by our proprietary data science and analytics, enables us to provide extensive yet customized choices to consumers."
We help small businesses but we also offer most of the big restaurants too - a bit odd from a marketing perspective but frankly that's what the enterprise investors will care about
Growth Strategy
Hilarious growth strategy - more restaurants and more consumers! DUH!
P&L - 2018, 2019, Nine Months End Sept. 2020
First of all the whole document doesn't focus on recent performance - the first 9 months BS is trying to capture some of the Q1 performance so as to create the appearance of better revenue growth in the future
Revenue clearly growing astronomically - 204% 18/19 and 226% in the past 9 months
Gross margins: 2018 - 22%, 2019 - 41%, First 9 months of 2019 - 40%, First 9 months of 2020 - 55%
My bet is a ton of gross margin is included in sales and marketing (free deliveries, discounts especially) which can help improve gross margin picture
Biggest thing tho - THE BURN ISN'T THAAAAT BAD - which is very surprising especially after seeing Uber and Lyft
Key Metrics
All of adjusted EBITDA is coming from the add-back on the spend due to AB5 and D&A
This is HEAVILY adjusted but again, probably not as bad as Uber's odd adjusted EBITDA definition
Total orders growing monstrously, in-line with revenue
GOV is the same - growing like crazy - issue might be that this is the peak GOV - hard to see a ton of growth out there unless Doordash gets every small town in America using its platform (which would cost a ton of money and probably be unprofitable customers)
Never seen Adjusted EBITDA as a % of GOV - this definition of Adjusted EBITDA is about to be hilarious
Take Rate i.e. Revenue / GOV - 2018 - 10.3%, 2019 - 11%, First nine months 2019 - 10.6%, First Nine months 2020 - 11.6%
Good to see it at least stay the same over time
Order Volume and Contribution Profit
I would say the Pandemic helped the business LOL
Getting back to the above point - there might not be any growth in the future which may be concerning
Doordash was valued around $16B in its latest round - which is ~8-10x run-rate revenue during the time of raise - that valuation is significantly above Uber (5x) and Lyft (3x) - like WAY above
Obviously growth is higher but for how long?
Odd that gross profit and Contribution profit fluctuate so much - how much of that is seasonal vs. mix of new business vs. existing customers? Seems a bit strange but I guess that is the life of a marketplace business
Contribution Profit is gross profit (revenue - delivery costs) - sales and marketing + depreciation + stock based comp + allocated overhead (unclear how much that is) - this seems like a pretty traditional definition but that last one could really skew it depending on what's included in there
Adjusted EBITDA
Adjusted EBITDA Definition
We define Adjusted EBITDA as net income (loss), adjusted to exclude (i) certain legal, tax, and regulatory settlements, reserves, and expenses, (ii) a one-time non-cash change in fair value of a forward contract related to the issuance of our Series F redeemable convertible preferred stock, (iii) loss on disposal of property and equipment, (iv) acquisition-related costs, (v) impairment expenses, (vi) provision for income taxes, (vii) interest income and expense, (viii) foreign exchange gain (loss), (ix) stock-based compensation expense and certain payroll tax expense, and (x) depreciation and amortization expense.
THIS IS A WILD DEFINITION OF EBITDA - so many adjustments that are clearly part of doing business in this complex market
Probably not as bad as Uber's weird definition but certainly not great either
Unit Economics
The crazy thing with this business model is you could actually call Contribution Loss = Revenue
Like there is no business without these adjusted costs of revenue and sales and marketing which is kind of crazy
I don't expect wall street to focus crazily on it but these economics are just not great compared to traditional software (that is obvious - this is a whole different business model). It just speaks to whether this will get a 10x revenue, software-like valuation
Cohort Performance
Why give historical cohorts but not recent ones?
AHHH its from an old report
Edison Trends. Based on the estimated dollar value of orders placed on DoorDash, Grubhub, and Uber Eats by a group of users that first placed an order on any such platform between January 1, 2019 and September 30, 2019
Quarterly P&L
Good to see revenue growth continuing and that you can show a profit
Man this company spends a lot of money - outspending revenue with sales and marketing on a quarterly basis historically - that is wild
Clearly sales and and marketing spend starting to amp up once again
AB5
"Depending on whether and how much we choose to increase fees and commissions, these increased costs could also lead to a lower Take Rate. The provisions resulting from the 2020 California ballot initiative that would become applicable to us include, but are not limited to, (i) net earnings (which excludes tips, tolls, and certain other amounts) to Dashers no less than a net earnings floor equal to (a) 120% of the minimum wage for a Dasher’s engaged time and (b) for Dashers using a motor vehicle, $0.30 per engaged mile (which amount shall be adjusted for inflation after 2021) and (ii) for Dashers averaging at least 15 hours per week of engaged time during a calendar quarter who subscribe to a qualifying health plan, payments to such Dashers of healthcare subsidies of varying dollar amounts depending on a Dasher’s engaged time per week."
Cash Flow
Net cash from operating activities was negative 308M and including investing activites it was -530M
This year its been positive 315M - the cash considerations are important in theory because it show how much Doordash will need to raise and the answer is probably a decent amount
Products
Doordash for Work was a new product I've never heard of but makes sense
Drive - doordash's white-label logistics service that basically pairs drivers with companies like Chipotle, Wingstop, and Little Caesar's that build and maintain their own technology and apps (And maybe or maybe not list on doordash marketplace)
Dashpass - 5 MILLION Consumer's on Dashpass is insane - $9.99 per month that means $120 * 5,000,000 = $600,000,000 subscription run-rate business
THAT IS HUGE and what's probably keeping the gross margins so high
Does Dashpass hurt restaurants? I actually don't know
It's also concerning around the pandemic - I would expect a ton of those are new adds during the pandemic and they haven't broken out historical detail on Dashpass consumers over time
Puts real risk in the forward numbers - more marketplace and the business is just worth less
Team and Board
TONY IS 36 BRUH
Crazy that Andy Fang at age 28 and Stanley Tang at 27 are on this board of directors
It's also a really big board for the size of the business
Softbank, GIC (Singapore investment fund), Kleiner Perkins, TCV, and Sequoia on board
Cap Table
Tony, Andy, and Stanley have all of the class B stock and its supervoting 20:1 so they control the company most likely
All of the other stock is worth one vote
Key Considerations
Demand for this is going to be super high - people love Tony and he's super young
Growth is really really strong (obviously because of the pandemic) but people will give Doordash credit for future growth for sure
Gross Margin profile is strong (probably because of Dashpass subscribers / recurring revenue) which will get more credit
Sales and marketing spend was actually below what I was expecting which was good to see
Adjusted EBITDA and cash flow are non-existent (their definitions are pretty adjusted) although not too far out of reach from actually being profitable from a cash flow from operations - capex perspective
This is the golden question for Grubhub, Uber, Lyft, Just Eat, and Doordash - can anyone ever be profitable - I think yes but its going to be painful for those organizations because of reduced headcount and more outsourcing of tech / operations
IPO Demand / Outcome
I would expect it to get a ton of retail demand given people know the technology and the Company pretty well
I'm going to bet it goes out around a ~$20B-$25B valuation or around 10x 2020E Revenue
Bull Case
This becomes the only market leading solution and Uber Eats and Grubhub go out of business do to unprofitable growth - hard to see that happening but its possible given burn rates / challenges and especially in the US
Dashpass becomes a staple way of eating for even more consumers across the world, WFH continues for a lot of people post-pandemic, and revenue shifts to more recurring, higher gross margin as a result, turning more into a software business
Self-driving cars literally change the unit economics on gross profit - ridiculous but has to be included
Drive and Dash for Work become much bigger businesses and start to contribute more to revenue
Bear Case
Growth stalls post pandemic - This is a very real threat / possibility and could materially hurt the stock price if it happens given it will likely trade in the public markets based on revenue growth - if this happens, they better show profitability
Never reaches profitability and continues raising money at worse and worse terms for the next ten years until it gets acquired / shuts down - probably won't happen - they would likely try to make it more profitable by changing cap structure and outsourcing more
Continued litigation / legal challenges hurt the company
Incremental customer acquisition is legitimately unprofitable and the company has to pivot into other delivery services - grocery, last mile, convenience, healthcare -at worse / more competitive margins
Competitors pour more money in than doordash and come up with better unit economics - Uber maybe if they can get a fleet of self-driving cars? Idk this feels a bit ridiculous